explicitClick to confirm you are 18+

A FATAL PARADOX

Henri BloxhamJun 8, 2017, 1:53:50 PM
thumb_up12thumb_downmore_vert

-Henri Bloxham

If a woman is aggressive - and a man confronts her aggression with aggression - most will likely call him abusive. If a woman is abusive and a man does not "suffer" her abuse "like a man," and he physically prevents her abuse or returns it; he likely be jailed.

I have had women say things to me and do things to me and my children that if they were men I would have killed them - or at the very least have given them a sound beating. But to do so would have landed me in jail - given me a record with which I could never be employed and prevented me from seeing my children. (And yet you fault men for their passivity.)

Yet if I suggest the only real solution to this paradox lies in the hands of our womenfolk - and I suggest that women must refrain from aggression and use more feminine means to accomplish their ends - likely most "modern" women will label the statement condescending and "sexist."

Women and men are not equal nor do they serve the same purpose. No to people in life are equal; even twins are not equal.

In the preservation of our race, in the sanctity of family each are mutually and equally necessary to the other; but to unilaterally profess that "men and women are equal" is a lie propagated to create competition between the sexes; the purpose of which being the destruction of relationships, the family unit and ultimately our race and society.

The typical reaction to my statement about equality is to explode with anger saying that such a statement is chauvinistic - but this is just a programmed response. It is so because to say that two things are not equal is not to say that one or the other specifically is superior to the other. It is to say that they are not equal.

If they are not equal - men will be superior to women in some aspects - and women will be superior to men in some aspects. That, by definition, is inequality. Such inequalities allow each sex to better perform the tribal tasks necessary for the successful propagation and advancement of our bloodlines our culture and our race.

Aggression between the sexes is not beneficial. The promulgation of constant competition within the family unit prevents cooperation and destroys unity; such competition can range from something as trivial as games - or as vital as the leadership of the family.

Are women in America in general more leftist minded than the men; I would scream resoundingly YES! So then if men and women are forced to compete for leadership of the family and one is progressive and the other is traditional - who decides the fate of the family? And if they cannot agree; and the woman leaves and takes the kids, as many women do; when presented with a "traditionalist" husband with whom they cannot reconcile; where does that lead our Folk? Straight into the arms of progressivism.

It was for this purpose that "equality" is pushed. It is for the destruction of the family that feminism is propagated. It is to make men and women compete for the same jobs - so that the children will ultimately suffer and our race will ultimately end that women were "liberated - to enter the work force."

I do not speak of ancient times or what was done then; if it was truly done then; it was done in such a manner because it was culturally accepted as the best option for our people at the time. And I believe; since most of the information about our history has been recorded and distributed to us via the Roman Catholic Church in one fashion or another - that whatever information we do have - is tainted.

In a tribal setting - if there was a situation of spousal abuse or child abuse other members of the tribe who knew knew and loved the family would have rectified the situation by whatever means might be necessary - ranging from public humiliation to exile to execution.

However; we now have the very (((system))) that created the strife between our men and women standing in the place of "arbitration" where tribal members and leaders would have stood - just waiting for an opportunity to use such strife as a weapon to destroy our families.

What hope of survival as a race do we have; if this fatal paradox cannot be resolved?