Pierce The Darkness - Chapter 6, Living An Illusion
Welcome back thinkers! Chapter 6 of “Pierce The Darkness” is titled “Living An Illusion” and that is exactly the world we are stuck with when society gets snared in a Fake Narrative Trap.
There is nothing figurative nor metaphorical about the scenario, our lives become a literal illusion.
For those who find the world makes no sense anymore, this is why. Everything is backwards? Yes, it means we’re stuck in a Fake Narrative Trap. In short, a Fake Narrative traps politicians into crafting policy that addresses the wrong problem with the only possible result being the wrong solution. We take the wrong road and as long as we stay on it, we can never reach the political promise land. In Reality, everything that occurred after making the wrong turn should not have happened, even if it is true.
Although I don’t know for certain, I suspect that the content in this chapter is hard for smart people to accept. I believe they understand it just fine, they just don’t like two staggering implications; that they can be controlled so easily, and a great fear that much of what they “know”, what they have been told on other important issues, is also wrong.
6. Living An Illusion
The last chapter showed the deadly impact of Deceit on perceptions, Beliefs, the Spiritual Realm, and the political process.
We know that Tyranny cannot drive its oppressive agenda on a free people without the use of Deceit, and this chapter will reveal the massive Deceits used to justify the implementation of the political COVID-19 Response and also expose the abusive cruelty of the Deceits sustaining the unending “Stop The Spread” program.
Furthermore, we’ll see why politicians aren’t at the top of the political food chain, and simple proof of why Deceit transforms knowledge into ignorance and understanding into confusion, which will uncover the true role Rand Paul types are playing in the illusion we’re living in. No offence to Rand Paul intended.
6.1 The Big Deceit That Started It All
Imperial College London’s Niall Ferguson’s novel coronavirus model projected terrifying COVID-19 death totals that caused fear and panic to race across the planet. That fear prompted politicians to drop the COVID-19 Response on us all.
Because policy consequences are always a better measure of policy intent than political spin, the wildly oppressive nature of the COVID-19 Response was the first indication that the Ferguson model death projections were Deceitful.
The next clue that that something wasn’t right was the fact that the coronavirus, being novel was unknown, so projected casualties were guaranteed to be wrong.
Moreover, all model projections are mere guesses until the point in the future that the model’s projections can be compared to the Reality that occurred. If the projections don’t come close, then the model is useless for any purpose.
Now that we are nearly two years into the COVID-19 Response, the veracity of the models can be determined simply by comparing COVID-19 Deaths to model projections.
According to the January 6, 2022, U.S. data provided by Worldometers, the 22-month COVID-19 death total was listed as 853,612. By comparison, Ferguson’s Narrative driving COVID-19 model projected 2.2 million deaths, a little more than 1.3 million higher than the official numbers.
Ferguson’s model projection was too high by 61% or a factor of 2.58. This is a huge error, a company killer in the business world. Ferguson’s model projections were terribly wrong and are sure to worsen once COVID-19 death counts are reduced to account for serious co-morbidities.
In Italy, for example, a health report claimed only 2.9% of COVID-19 deaths were due to the virus because of co-morbidities found in the remaining 97.1% of deaths. So, lets give some wiggle room and use 10% to give Authorities some small benefit of doubt.
Going back to the U.S. example, reducing the death count by 90% would increase Ferguson’s model projection error to a shameful 96%. This is equivalent to being paid $4000 for a $100,000 per year contract.
The extremely heavy use of useless model projections by politicians and the media could be brushed off as layman’s ignorance of complex subjects if not for the following truths:
- The unsubstantiated projections are always treated as absolute fact.
- The unsubstantiated projections consistently paint a terrifying picture of the future.
- The unsubstantiated projections are never reviewed for accuracy.
- The unsubstantiated projections require the imposition of grand political solutions at great cost to the taxpayer.
- Their political success generates a constant stream of new and dramatic unsubstantiated model projections.
Models have an incredible capacity for Deceit and using unsubstantiated models to justify political policy is proof of corrupt political intent.
Model projections were and are frantically reported as they are necessary to pump up the Fear factor. However, there is another Deceit involved, the Authority’s elimination of our Natural Human Response system from the COVID-19 threat equation.
Humanity’s Natural Immune Response system ensures over 99.9% of people would not die from COVID-19 each year. That means the COVID-19 Response on its own could only save less than .1% of the population. That is the best the COVID-19 Response could possibly accomplish, and it would fail because that tiny percentage is filled with the weakest and most vulnerable populations.
Eliminating our natural immune system from the threat calculation gives the COVID-19 Response responsibility for saving 100% of the population instead of .1%, or less. The Deceit here is heart rending as it inflates the need for the COVID-19 Response by a factor of 1000, or nearly 100,000%.
Your $100,000 a year job now pays out $100. Would you trust this Employer? Throw in the shameful 96% model Deceit described above and you’re beautiful $100,000 contract is worth $4, and sadly, this estimate is on the high side.
Governments never considered performing due diligence on the obviously fraudulent COVID-19 models. What are the odds any Government is going to admit to such a massive mistake at this point?
These incredibly large Deceits are flat out lies and are the only reason the world was subjected to the COVID-19 Response. There never was a legitimate justification for the draconian policy, which means that it, and absolutely every rule, regulation, harmful consequence, and news story that followed should never have happened.
6.2 It’s All Theatre From Here On
We can see how the whole of society is trapped the moment a Fake Narrative is accepted as absolute Truth. That moment is the instant the public’s false fears demand real political action with the understanding that the policy solution be robust enough to deal with size of the perceived threat. This dynamic remains in force as long as the Fake Narrative can sustain the public’s state of fear.
In order to serve the panicked public, the political class will respond with policy proposals designed to repel the imaginary threat, thereby reducing fears of imminent disaster, and taming the public’s panic. Government saves the day!
Obviously, political parties must satisfy their political base in order to survive, so the argument turns to which party’s policy will best address the looming peril. However, there is no policy solution that can possibly end the peril because the threat doesn’t really exist. However, they have to try in order to show they care.
With COVID-19, the Response was designed by an external source. We know this to be the case because of the near identical actions taken by Governments around the world. The effect is to narrow the bounds of internal policy discussion as all parties are working from within the Response’s framework. This plan is, uncoincidentally, very similar to the manner that Fake Narratives corral all discussion, perceptions, and Beliefs within it’s borders.
In Reality, every political party is attempting to solve the wrong problem. This guarantees that the solution also be wrong so in the end they’re actually fighting about whose policy will result in the least damage to society. It is impossible to escape the Truth that damage will be done when the wrong solution is implemented, and the tsunami of harm generated by the COVID-19 Response proves this Truth beyond any doubt.
As no politicians are willing to attack the Narrative lest the people watching perceive that politician to be indifferent of their fears, which could potentially result in theirs fears coming true, they are all persuaded to dance to the Fake Narrative’s tune. A great example in the United States would be Rand Paul and his gain-of-function battles with Anthony Fauci. Senator Paul’s position doesn’t simply sustain the Narrative, it helps feed the false fears that drive it because the picture it paints is of a more virulent and deadly virus.
Once the wrong policy is implemented, actual consequences and obvious potential consequences become an unlimited source of fuel for a media shark feeding frenzy.
The following short discussion will focus on three insatiable types of sharks: Fake Narrative Drivers, consequence guided Fake Narrative Supporters and consequence guided Fake Narrative Opposition.
A fourth extremely rare type, Fake Narrative Deniers are heavily censored and therefore denied a seat at the boundless buffet.
Let’s begin with the Fake Narrative Drivers, the Great Whites of the bunch.
Their job is to keep everyone petrified with fear, to instruct the political class, and to bite the heads off of anyone who threatens to expose the Deceits behind the Narrative. Should they lose the ability to protect the Deceits, they will simply move on to the next Great Big lie and continue their campaign of terror.
Next up are the consequence guided Fake Narrative Supporters who are fast and fierce associates of the Great Whites, the Tiger sharks. Their role also includes defending the Narrative and to report on the real-life consequences of the impact of the Narrative’s COVID-19 Response. This allows the media to mix truth into the message, even if those truths are illusory because the consequences shouldn’t have occurred. They stand ready with Narrative defending stories whenever some Bull shark successfully makes some Truth known. The subsequently withdrawn hit piece on hydroxychloroquine from the prestigious medical journal, The Lancet, serves as one excellent example.
Last, but certainly not least, are the consequence guided Fake Narrative Opposition, the dogged Bull sharks. This group does their best to expose the Truth and are accumulating mountains of evidence with respect to the damage the COVID-19 Narrative has and continues to do. However, while their work is important, it is still constrained within the Fake Narrative set by the Great Whites and barely slows the big beasts down. In the future, their fantastic work will be useful in helping people grasp the enormity of the crimes that were committed against them.
It is evident that the COVID-19 Response should never have been implemented in the first place, so what has allowed the Fake Narrative to thrive for so long?
6.3 Stop The Spread’s PCR Testing Protocol
At this point we know we’ve been snared in the COVID-19 Narrative Trap and the COVID-19 Response should never have happened. This means all related stories must be misleading and deceptive. Also, we’ve learned that politicians are not our true leaders as they, along with us, are simply dancing to the Fake Narrative’s tune.
Yet it is understandable that some will dismiss those Truths because of a barrage of sensational media reports screaming that the virus is spreading faster than ever, and they still trust the media and Government more than they trust themselves.
Hopefully the following will help them take the next step in their fight against Fear.
The following Q & A is taken from the Alberta Government’s PCR page, which was still live on January 7, 2022.
“Q: How many cycles are used in the amplification process, and what is the cut-off threshold for determining a positive result?
A: The number of amplification cycles required to determine whether a COVID-19 sample is positive generally ranges from 15 to 35 cycles, but the threshold is dependent on many factors specific to each test platform, the equipment being used, as well as the quality of the samples being tested.“
You may find the Q & A somewhat confusing; it is and that too is by explicit design. I’ll show one example of how their expert wordsmithing deceives the mind before moving on.
Compare the phrases.
“The number of amplification cycles required to determine whether a COVID-19 sample is positive”
“The number of amplification cycles required to determine whether a sample is COVID-19 positive”
The first is as written in the Answer and does not indicate a positive COVID-19 result because it is talking about a sample yet to be tested. It’s linguistic slight of mind that tricks perceptions into linking the positive result with COVID-19.
The second statement would refer to a positive COVID-19 result. The deception in the official Answer is no mistake. It prevents the Answer from being labelled a lie, but it is misleading.
However, the confusing aspects are irrelevant in the final analysis which will focus on the number of cycles the amplification process is run, which generally ranges from 15 to 35 cycles.
Running a test at 15 cycles is not the same as running a test at 35 cycles, is it? it is impossible because if they were the same, only one cycle range would be needed. They are different tests and therefore have the capability of producing different results, which is key to the fraud being perpetrated.
In fact, every different cycle rate is a different test from all the others and can produce different results from one another, although once a positive is hit then every higher cycle rate after will also be positive. The Alberta Government is generally allowing 21 different tests to be run, and if there are concerns about test platforms, equipment, or sample quality, then that might necessitate running the process at rates above 35 cycles.
Hypothetically, if you had the responsibility to run the PCR test protocol, what do you think would happen if,
- You decreased testing requirements and the number of tests run?
- You increased testing requirements and the number of tests run?
- You lowered the number of cycles used by the amplification process?
- You raised the number of cycles used by the amplification process?
- You decreased testing requirements and lowered amplification cycle rates?
- You increased testing requirements and raised amplification cycle rates?
I suspect you know with a high degree of confidence how each scenario above, and others unmentioned, would generally impact the number of cases found and reported. I further suspect you understand how consequential the “positive result” surges and wanes is to society’s perceptions and how those perceptions might exacerbate feelings of fear or induce relief. Lastly, I suspect you are beginning to understand that the PCR Testing protocol’s greatest strength is its ability to generate surges and wanes on demand, and that those in control of the process can therefore control society’s fear or relief level with ease, thereby justifying the next set of political actions.
In other words, Authorities can plan and exploit our fears with unerring accuracy. Back in March of 2020, when they were preparing to implement drastic lockdown measures, they assured us that they could stop the spread and contain the disease within two weeks, saving millions from death and illness in the process.
What did Authorities around the world do to “Stop the Spread”? They imposed dramatic restrictions, increased testing practices, promoted contact tracing policies and implemented the PCR Testing protocol to allow them to “track” the spread of the disease.
Furthermore, keep in mind that the proof above holds true for every variant and virus measured using the PCR Test protocol.
If changing the amplification process’ number of cycles can flip a test result from negative to positive, then the problem isn’t, as many have come to believe, false positives, but rather the fact that all PCR protocol test results are completely untrustworthy and, therefore, unreliable.
We previously concluded that all COVID-19 facts and stories were illusory because the sizable Deceits used to trigger the Narrative trap meant the COVID-19 Response was unnecessary. Now we see how attaching Fear to the number of cases reported and the manipulation of the PCR test protocol was used to sustain the COVID-19 Narrative Trap.
And, considering that the PCR test protocol produces unreliable results, we must conclude that there is not one single reliable COVID-19 death or case count statistic in any jurisdiction anywhere in the world where the PCR Test protocol was used. I believe that statement is worth repeating with emphasis.
THERE IS NOT ONE SINGLE RELIABLE COVID-19 DEATH OR CASE COUNT STATISTIC IN ANY JURISDICTION ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD WHERE THE PCR TEST PROTOCOL WAS USED!
Still, if Governments disagree I suppose they could quickly prove the veracity of the PCR testing protocol by running samples of influenza-A, influenza-B, a non-COVID-19 coronavirus, and COVID-19 through the 21 different cycle rates. The only positives returned should be for COVID-19. And for all 21 tests.
I welcome they give it a try.
So, the PCR Test protocol is a fraud in and of itself, but there is still another tricky Deceit buried in the “Stop the Spread” Narrative.
Few dispute the fact that the young and healthy are at much less risk of dying from flus and colds than the old and frail because healthy immune systems are much more adept at fighting off infections than weakened ones. The healthiest age group, according to the CDC, is several thousand times less at risk than the most vulnerable age group.
The “Stop The Spread” Narrative, however, treats all COVID-19 infections as equals regardless of risk while simultaneously ignoring the fact that over 99.9% of people would not die from the infection anyway. This trick allows them to hyper-inflate needless Fears into the stratosphere.
Let’s say a teenager and their great grandparents test positive. The media headlines scream, three more cases! However, the teenager is several thousand times, or hundreds of thousands of percent, less at risk of death than the great grandparents. That differential, several hundreds of thousands of percent in this example, is the size of the Deceit injected into the media’s case count statistic. Twice, in this example. Once for each grandparent.
So not only is the PCR Test protocol a manipulative tool allowing granular control of the number of positives generated, attaching Fear to the number of cases is the cruel con that has enabled the media to continually perpetuate Fear, giving politicians the “evidence” needed to demand society submit to harmful and divisive totalitarian policies.
Maybe this question will help reveal the scam more clearly. Would it be OK for the media to focus only on the number of cases if an infectious disease was spreading like wildfire, but it had a 0% fatality rate? The spread rate would be terrifying, but the fatality rate would make it a non-issue.
The overall COVID-19 death rate, while impossible to know, is similar to the flu and so isn’t much higher than 0%.
So, it should come as no surprise that massive Deceits would be required to sustain a COVID-19 Response that should never have happened
6.4 The Grand Delusion
As tough as it is to accept, the Truth we must swallow is that every COVID-19 story and report we’ve consumed is illusory, and all the COVID-19 data we trusted is unreliable. It’s a giant, jagged pill but it’s time to swallow it.
We must accept that we’ve all been snared by the COVID-19 Narrative Trap, that the COVID-19 Response was illegitimate and unnecessary, that the cruelty in the “Stop the Spread” protocol was the deliberate aim, and we have brutalized and fought each other solely for Tyranny’s entertainment while paying them dearly for the privilege.
Corporeally, a Fake Narrative destroys the mind with delusion. Spiritually it is a Satanic level Evil. Politically, it is the most devastating system of human oppression ever devised. All together, it is one masterful piece of anti-human, anti-freedom, anti-God weaponry but as invincible as it seems, it isn’t omnipotent.
6.5 A Shift in the Feeding Grounds
At first glance, the CDC’s withdrawal of support for the PCR Test protocol and the apparent acceptance of the disease resistant strength of our natural Immune Response System both look like major battle wins for freedom. They are, after all, two of the major Deceits used to generate and carry the COVID-19 Narrative’s Fear campaign against humanity.
What is important to remember though, is what Tyranny hasn’t lost. The COVID-19 Response, control of the infrastructure used to coerce Authority into enforcing totalitarian decrees, and most importantly, the ability to create more Fake Narrative Traps.
Tyranny’s release of the PCR Test protocol and acceptance of our natural Immune Response Systems do indicate change is coming, but probably not exactly as we hope. What it says is that Tyranny has lost those arguments to the point they can’t plausibly make them any longer. So, they will concede them, lose nothing, and move on to different fraudulent arguments to keep the game going.
In other words, the Great Whites are preparing to move towards new feeding grounds, but we’re still the prey.
I suspect Evil Tyranny is quite pleased with the COVID-19’s Response successes and they’ll strive to run the program as long as possible. It is highly possible that the PCR test replacement will allow them to continue the scam and associate Fear directly with the number of positive cases the new test produces. The next disease threat doesn’t need to be COVID-19; it could be any virus with flu like fatality rates because society’s fears are now bound to the spread of a disease and not its lethality.
Should we see the relaxation of COVID-19 restrictions it will be tempting to view them as a sign of Tyranny in retreat. Not a chance while they still control the Fake Narrative. Instead, it will be a Sun Tzu like move to convince the people, particularly angry protestors, that Tyranny has been weakened when in fact they will simply be drawing us in toward the next snare.
The next Fake Narrative Trap may be another virus but at some point in the near future, Climate Change Fears will trigger Tyranny’s next and likely final play as that Narrative’s fears will produce political policy that results in global Energy Poverty. The consequence of Energy Poverty will result in death and destruction on a scale that will make survivors pine for the good old days of COVID-19 lockdowns.
So please, stay vigilant and organized, because this fight doesn’t end well until the Fake Narrative is destroyed and those who controlled it are stripped of their ability to do it again.
6.6 Narrative Failures – Past, and Future?
The Narrative Trap’s snare can be slipped but as mentioned, escaping it doesn’t end the threat. Here are two examples to consider, one from the past and the other a possible future.
6.6.1 Nuremberg
Let me begin by wishing success for the groups fighting for Nuremberg style trials. Their concerted effort to hold responsible those who have committed crimes against humanity using the COVID-19 Response as a tool of terror is admirable and worthy of support. May all these groups prevail, and appropriate justice be done.
However, the fact is, these conflicts are being waged within the COVID-19 Narrative Trap. This means the fights are occurring on the enemy’s battlefield and using their rules of engagement. So, just as the call for wearing two masks is an admission that masks don’t work, the call for Nuremberg 2 trials is an admission that Nuremberg 1 failed to truly end the Evil responsible for the heinous crimes of the day.
Even if these new trials are successful, those found culpable will not be the people we need to stop in order to secure a free future. They will be sacrificial fodder to convince the masses that justice has been done, while the real Evil slithers behind a new rock knowing they remain in control of the corrupt system that has brought us all to the precipice of disaster.
6.6.2 Trump Media Technology Group And “Truth Social”
Millions of people have placed their trust in President Donald J. Trump to help end the madness sweeping the planet, and for good reason as he has been the most vocal political force willing to call the media out for their ongoing Deceits about every important political topic.
Although President Trump may be the most anti-establishment politician the world has seen in our lifetimes, he too swallowed the COV-aid, or pretended to, and reacted to the public’s fears. We know this because he often touts the number of lives his actions saved, an impossibility to prove and only sensible when compared to the Narrative Trap’s ridiculous death projections. We also shouldn’t forget his unwavering support for the warp speed mRNA vaccines.
For those who feel President Trump had to act, consider that as further proof the Narrative is in control, not the politicians nor the people. This means the Narrative has been our Reality for a very long time, and it has spent that time shaping our cultures and writing our laws.
The laudable purpose of the Trump Media Technology Group is to counter Fake Narratives, giving Truth a voice and freedom a chance. Yet, if he refuses to admit that the Narrative is in control then he will rightly be held responsible for the vast harm being done by the experimental vaccines. It will also mean that “Truth Social” will be born, bred, and raised on top of the most devastating Deceits to hit humanity in known history.
If successful within the current system, the Trump Media Technology Group could evolve from countering the Narrative to controlling the Narrative, where it would eventually succumb to the same human weaknesses that have corrupted our world today.
Until next time,
Tomorrow's post will bring Chapter 7 of "Pierce The Darkness" , "It's Accountability Time". One more reason that people might find cause to reject Chapter 6, "Living An Illusion" is that Chapter 7 essentially asks people hold themselves to account. I think people are offended by the suggestion. However, I'm offended it needs to be mentioned at all.
Have a good one,