A Possible Explanation for Gender Mania

A Possible Explanation for Gender Mania

Before the sexual revolution and the subsequent acceptance of open sexuality within society, the peak thing a person could be is a couple. To be married was the ultimate attainment of one's sexuality. Those in couples occasionally divorced, or split, etc. but in general the majority stayed together.

Once the real effects of the sexual revolution took hold, the standards were blown out of the water. Polygamy was the new standard. It was once considered a socially wrong act to sleep around, and before contraception was readily available, your acts of polygamy would go immediately punished, in quite obvious ways.

Now, there is little risk. I have no comment on the acts of others, and their desires for others, etc. I do not pretend to understand the mind of others, but I do know what works, polygamy doesn't work very well sustainable on a society-wide basis. It is a non-committal idea and simply, in a committal society, it doesn't work on the larger scale. But I digress.

When we became hyper focused on polygamy, the standard changed as I previously said, as to what the highest form one could be sexually. It used to be "the couple" but when that became degraded, it became "the group" and as a result, rampant, divergent individuality has arisen; the self-identity movement. Where before, the motivating statement was an "I do" a statement of intent, the new movement gives us the statement that we can sum up as "I am" or "I need" or even "I won't."

Where as the traditional format of the relationship once was a commitment, unity, togetherness and over all, the good of the many given by the few, the non-committal ideologues instead dissect commitment, scoff at it and defy it, instead focusing on themselves, their needs, and their focus on defiance.

This has led to what I call Gender Mania, the outright toxic over-obsession with anti-sex, that is to say a fear of sex, a focus on the out-group, and a pretty damn toxic view towards the "old way" of doing things. Marriage is considered "patriarchal" which is to say, traditionalist. Traditionalism is considered the new devil. If you don't agree with them, you are the devil. If you don't silently nod your head and agree like a good little farm animal, you're mocked and blocked and decried on social media.

We have, by way of "freeing" people from the societal expectations of yesterday, instead created a world where things are so divided, so fragmented that even the most simple unit of society, the two, pair or couple, is seen as toxic. And don't even mention families to them, the most patriarchal institution of them all.

These people are angry, sexless societal rejects who prop themselves up, surround themselves with like-minded sycophants and constantly sit in a state of perpetual self-ego-stroking. They are not the future of society. They're not even the future of their own generation, they're quite simply failures. Most of them won't have kids, their ideas are about as anti-mimetic as it comes, and their delivery of said ideas is bloody awful.

They will die out fairly quickly. They leave no replacement for themselves, ideologically, intellectually, or even in the form of a coupling/child. They are a failed ideology. Any ideology that is anti-propagation will be doomed to die.

So I wouldn't threat too much about them. Let them be angry, because at the end of the day, they're going to be some of the loneliest, most depressed people out there. This is a trend, it will end. But not just yet, we have to go through a lot more of this in the next decade.

Happy New Year everyone. And thank you for reading.