Culture Shift: The slippery slope to a radically different identity. Part 1

              Today I would like to talk a bit about how the general population has been manipulated into an involuntary metamorphosis some still don't fully realize has happened, is still happening, and will continue to happen. In the first installment I will set the stage to explain what I'm talking about it, and then continue elaborating with some examples of tactics used in sequential installments. 

Its nearly impossible to tell the exact date when the Post-Modern culture shift began. Since it has been such a steady process that is intentionally designed not to alarm anyone to its occurrence. Surely it's just crazy grandpa remembering things with unfair nostalgia, right?  No, grandpa actually has a comparison point from his years of life and is trying to inform you of the changes he can see. However even he can only see a short distance back. What grandpa might swear began in the 1960's, his father would claim began in the 1940's, and the father before that would say 1914-1918. You notice the trend, each generation has observed a major shift that some sources like author E. Michael Jones swear he can trace back to the 18th century. There is reason to believe it may have been going on longer than that. 

With it seeming to be a never ending process; we can only wonder if its just human nature. Easily coming to the conclusion that it is natural progress that has been going on since the dawn of man. Unfortunately, this is merely the way to address the issue with a sense of self-comforting powerlessness without truly thinking about it at all. "Why should I care? Things have always been shifting and will continue to shift." While that may be true, its important to note that not all shifts have been the same. Humanity has not moved consistently in one direction but instead been locked in an endless struggle of conflicting ideas, systems/methods, and culture. Its only in the post-modern shift that we are now taught by our most trusted institutions such as: universities, government bodies, churches, sometimes even friends and family that we can achieve true progress through submission. We should no longer struggle against what they claim is inevitable and just accept our losses; which they of course deny it is a loss. They change that ugly word to nicer words like "cultural enrichment" and "diversity." That's really just an insult to everyone's intelligence because it too often implies the developed cultures are inferior to the undeveloped ones, or that everyone losing their native culture to transform into some soulless global standard is somehow diverse. 

One can only begin to wonder what side someone is truly on these days. With so many preaching a gospel of collapse and self destruction; Are they even a supporter of our country? What kind of progress are they actually trying to achieve? Is it really going to be good for all of us? These questions are important to ask ourselves as we consume more information, especially in contrast with honest observation of what is happening all around us. You will form your own opinion but it becomes fairly obvious with enough information that these people really do not care about the good of all people. They just want a political shift, which they are achieving through a cultural shift. A new culture which unfairly destroys its host nation in favor of fair weather parasites in the form of culturally incompatible economic migrants, at least for now. Not a single country that embraces this doctrine will maintain its traditional national identity a century from now, this is by design. 

The true political nature of this culture shift is exactly that, break down the old way of life in favor of a revolutionary new way. Some groups openly admit that, others do not.  If they have to directly or indirectly lie its no concern to them, the ends justify the means in their mindset. Perhaps the most genius part of their schemes is the realization of how dangerous cultural differences can be to a nation. Culture defines large groups of people in so many ways: from beliefs and values to traditions and morality. Whenever you have friction between large groups you will have dissent, and conflict. Especially when they can no longer agree what morality is, or what values the common person should have. In some cases we can't even agree what language a citizen should speak. Even when its common knowledge that language is the most important glue to a society, you can't have any form of communication without it. Without communication you cannot form a bond and move in a common direction. Instead at the most basic level you are divided, a division which only grows wider from this root. 

This new bastardization of the term "diversity" speaks about this variant. Its not about enrichment or making people happier. The real goal is to fill society full of fracture points which will one day break apart to such an extreme that the old nations will no longer be able to continue functioning. The most concerning part of it all is that it's being done on such a large scale. We are not talking about one country here, we are not even talking about a handful of countries. What we have is a global shift setting the stage for the "revolutionary holocaust" Karl Marx predicted would be necessary. It's not a far away problem only affecting some distant country. It's a disease that has likely infected your nation already.

I will end part 1 here, and begin delving deeper into their methods and goals next time.