Dr. Peter Doshi's speech on Capitol Hill on mRNA drugs
This is a fantastic speech by Dr. Peter Doshi you will not want to miss:
https://odysee.com/@Handy_Bigsticks:2/Peter-Doshi-Panel-Discussion-on-vaccines:c
Note that his speech was OBVIOUSLY banned from YouTube - for archival purposes, this was the orignial link:
Who is Dr. Peter Doshi?
You probably will want to know why you should listen to this guy. Here is his profile from BMJ:
https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/editorial-staff/peter-doshi
Peter Doshi is a senior editor at The BMJ and on the News & Views team. Based in Baltimore, he is also an associate professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy. His research focuses on the drug approval process, how the risks and benefits of medical products are assessed and communicated, and improving the credibility and accuracy of evidence synthesis and biomedical publications. Doshi campaigns for greater transparency of clinical trial data and leads the Restoring Invisible and Abandoned Trials (RIAT) initiative, which aims to ensure clinical trial publications are accurate, complete, and data are publicly available. Doshi also has strong interests in journalism as a vehicle for encouraging better practice and improving the research enterprise. Doshi completed a fellowship in comparative effectiveness research at Johns Hopkins and received his PhD in history, anthropology, and science, technology and society from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
The main points he makes
As professor, he teaches his students to learn how to think critically, so he asks pertinent questions:
- If this is a "pandemic of the unvaccinated", then why is a booster shot required?
- do the mRNA products actually "save lives"?
- why was the definition of "antivaxxer" changed?
- why was the definition of "vaccine" changed?
He makes a point I've kept repeating over and over since they introduced these mRNA products: they do NOT match the definition of "vaccine". Their effect matches the effect of a drug that is administered when one falls sick. They do NOT prevent infection or spreading a virus, as one would expect of a vaccine. Naming them "vaccine" is supposed to automatically convey that they are safe and effective and have all the properties of other vaccines, which is simply a lie.
Attacks on Dr. Doshi
Note that Dr.Doshi does not question vaccines in general, but he has been questioning the merits of various specific vaccines in the past, which brought the ire of the entire vaccine lobby upon him.
Take this attack here:
https://respectfulinsolence.com/2021/01/15/why-is-peter-doshi-still-an-editor-at-the-bmj/
"Peter Doshi is at least borderline antivaccine"
What does that even mean? I haven't seen him doubt the principle of vaccination. Every intelligent, educated person knows that there are numerous vaccines that have been proven to be a true blessing. But every single vaccine is an independent product with its specific properties - labeling something a "vaccine" does not confer it any kind of properties unless they have been specifically established for that one product. Lots of vaccines have been proven to be outright harmful or useless and have been recalled.
"and has been casting doubt on vaccine efficacy since 2009"
Well maybe he was right - how about that? That's exactly the role of someone in his position. 2009 was the year when Big Pharma corrupted the WHO, which recommended swine 'flu vaccines. Based on this recommendations, lots of governments spent tens of billions to stockpile those vaccines, which turned out to be completely useless.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2010/jun/04/swine-flu-experts-big-pharmaceutical
There are "vaccines" that probably should not even exist, e.g. the "vaccine" that WHO developed to prevent pregnancies - a eugenics product and one gets the distinct impression that WHO did not really explain to their victims what their product was supposed to do:
"The WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation. Its formation, objectives and research activities"
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1874951/
There were sufficiently persistent rumors about the abuse of such vaccines to raise official questions:
"Tetanus vaccine may be laced with anti-fertility drug. International / developing countries"
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12346214/
Blindly trusting the "authorities" or the label "vaccine" is clearly not an option.
Anti-Covid vaccine questions reason for attacks
"Earlier this month, he posted a badly flawed “analysis” casting doubt on the efficacy of the Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines. Why does The BMJ still employ him?"
His analysis was perfectly accurate - it turned out that those mRNA products are nowhere nearly as good as advertised. In fact, they seem to require "booster" shots every 6 months, which makes them essentially useless. Their effectiveness seems to decrease to under 50% within a few months, so Dr. Doshi's questions were spot on!
We now learned that Pfizer committed massive fraud, during the trials, which did not prove that their product was safe and effective at all:
Adverse reactions have turned out to be quite catastrophic and in fact
According to this study, the anti-Covid "vaccines" caused more harm than good:
A conclusion supported by the WHO adverse reactions web site VigiAccess:
These are the kind of headlines no one wanted to read, ever:
We need more professionals like Dr.Doshi to ask questions before people are injected with a dangerous substance!
And we NEVER need institutions to change the definition of words to push a political agenda!