Christchurch vs. Islamic terrorism ignored by media

16 Mar 2019

This is not about diminishing the horror of the attack in New Zealand, but the urgently necessary reminder that it was an absolutely unique exception that Muslims were attacked by a non-Muslim, while terrorist attacks by Muslims on everyone else - Muslims and non-Muslims - are relentless and murderous, yet remain almost entirely unnoticed.

The way the media and politicians responded to the Christchurch attack, one would think that Muslims are the ones who are suffering most from prosecution by white supremacists.Instead, Muslims are the worst perpetrators of terrorism, day after day, and we are constantly told that "it has noting to do with Islam".

This has nothing to do with "collective blame". It is about the ideology of Islam itself.

A debater challenged my post and claimed:

"This is a complex issue, fuelled by politics, economics, extreme religious ideology, imperialism, sociology, education".

Here is my systematic reply to his objection:

It has NOTHING to do with politics: the exact same Islam has plagued humanity for 1400 years. ere is an extensive - though not complete - list of acts of violence by Muslims in the name of Islam, starting with Mohammed - this is how Islam was imposed and spread, through violence:

https://www.dreuz.info/2016/07/22/crimes-de-lislam-depuis-les-origines-une-liste-qui-fait-tourner-la-tete-ca-une-religion-de-paix-ils-se-foutent-de-nous/

Mohammed himself told his followers to spread terror in the hearts of the enemies of Islam - which is anyone who does not submit to Islam.Here is an Imam on Lebanese TV quoting a Hadith that describes how Mohammed treated camel thieves to justify barbaric acts by the Taliban:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwZVFc5WvXY&list=PL0940C29074B04453&index=10&t=0s

This is very important to understand: Muslims CANNOT condemn acts of terrorism committed in the name of Islam or they would have to condemn Mohammed himself.

For the same reason, they cannot condemn rape of non-Muslims or slavery, because both were practiced by Mohammed.

Economics: The most extremist countries that spend horrendous amounts of money spreading political Islam and Sharia law are the richest Islamic countries! Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Iran spend billions and billions to set up mosques around the planet and send them their most fundamentalist preachers.

The idea that fundamentalism is somehow related to poverty is absurd. Rich Muslims use their power to spread Islam. Look at the actions of the OIC, the Organization of Islamic Countries at the UN: they consistently use their power to impose more and more Islamic values.Iran condemns a woman who was fighting for human rights to 38 years in prison & torture:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-47531312

The very next day, the UN picks Iran for the women's rights council: https://www.unwatch.org/un-picks-iran-to-judge-

Imperialism: if there ever was an imperial ideology, it is Islam! How else do you think they reached this extent? The reason they finally started losing against Europe, militarily, is because Islam does not favor science, research and technology, as every scientific discovery violates the principles of Islam. To this day, only 3 Muslims obtained a scientific Nobel Price - all 3 did not live and work in a Muslim country.

Sociology, education: This is based on the famous assumption that fundamentalists and terrorists must be of low education and low economic status. The exact opposite is true! The most fanatical Muslims are from the upper middle class and upper class. They are also the most educated.

This observation was confirmed by a study by the Foreign Policy Magazine:

http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67976/graeme-blair-c-christine-fair-neil-malhotra-jacob-n-shapiro/pakistans-middle-class-extremists

It was students, not peasants, beating a co-student to death for alleged apostasy, in Pakistan:

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1382848/journalism-student-killed-mardan-university-alleged-blasphemy/

The majority of terrorists are highly educated - most of the 9/11 terrorists were engineers. An assistant professor of Physics at EPFL and CERN was arrested in France because he had tried to help Al Qaeda to commit terrorist attacks.

4 doctors in the UK and Australia committed 2 simultaneous terrorist attacks on airports. Supposedly well integrated doctors with a high income.

This doctor is entirely representative - high education, high income, lived in the US, educated his sons to be Jihadis:

http://adinakutnicki.com/2014/10/11/isisislamic-jihad-inculcated-via-bostons-terror-tied-father-sonmentoring-americas-kiddies-more-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/

Or this guy, the owner of Bridges TV in NYC who claimed that his TV channel was supposed to build bridges between Muslims and non-Muslims. When his wife wanted to leave him, he decapitated her:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,494785,00.html

This Pakistani ex-Muslim confirms that the root cause for Islamic terrorism is ... Islam:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ali-a-rizvi/an-atheist-muslims-perspective-on-the-root-causes-of-islamist-jihadism-and-the-politics-of-islamophobia_b_3159286.html

This study by the Social University of Berlin (not exactly "right-wing extremists") from 2014 confirmed that 66% of all Muslims in Europe had to be considered as fundamentalists. Not a "small minority", no 2/3!!!

https://www.wzb.eu/de/pressemitteilung/islamischer-religioeser-fundamentalismus-ist-weit-verbreitet

As I mentioned, the minister of religious affairs of Tunisia officially applauded the terrorists who had attacked Charlie Hebdo in Paris:

http://www.tunisiefocus.com/politique/le-ministere-tunisien-des-affaires-religieuses-applaudit-les-assassins-de-charlie-hebdo-108050/

Please ask any teacher in Europe who has Muslim pupils - they will confirm that most, if not all, their Muslim students thought that the attack on Charlie Hebdo was "justified" by their "insults against Mohammed".

25% openly admitted that they supported the terrorists in a poll:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/11433776/Quarter-of-British-Muslims-sympathise-with-Charlie-Hebdo-terrorists.html

Can you imagine the scandal if 25% of people in New Zealand said that they supported the terrorist in Christchurch?

In a 2010 poll, 49% of Muslims in the UK wanted Sharia law, but among students, it was 75%!

"Its far to simple to label every Muslim a terrorist" NO ONE ever did that! Even when it was glaringly obvious that there was a huge problem, everyone always finds excuses.

This is the first Muslim minister in the UK speaking to an exclusively Muslim audience. Please listen to his speech, which is most revealing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1prA3W1tk2I&list=PL0940C29074B04453&index=9&t=4s

He states that the goal must be to stuff the UK government with Muslims and to have a Muslim prime minister, which he hops "Insh'Allah" will happen in the near future. Note how he absolutely does not care one bit of what party that minister may be, he ONLY cares about the fact that he should be Muslim.

"which has fuelled incidents such as in Christchurch"

WRONG: if you read the manifesto of the terrorist, you would see that he didn't really care about Islam, ONLY about non-white immigrants and about how alleged "overpopulation" was supposedly destroying the planet. He is a firm believe in the man-made global warming hoax.