The Gun in the Room; the relationships between men and women in the West
2018/12/17
The Gun in the Room;
the relationships between men and women in the West
Hi, thanks for dropping by and listen to what I have to say.
Recently I became aware of the Briffault’s Law and it hit me like a truck. This law explains many of the behaviors of women and unless a better hypothesis is presented that explains what the Briffault’s Law model explains and more, I have to accept Briffault’s research and observations. Since I advocate for Men’s Rights, the question of the interactions between men and women is something that concerns me. If the Briffault’s Law is true, the concept of marriage, as we know it, can only fail. This realization got me down a bit, but since I have a tendency to be obsessed with problems, I conceptualized some solutions to the problem. I would like to share my conclusions with you.
In order to do that, we will first explore what is Triffault’s Law; then we will analyse the current state of relationships in the West (I will focus mainly on the aspect of marriages, civil unions and family); we will explore 3 models I have thought of that could potentially work and solve the situation of men in those unions. The 3 models are: The MGTOW model, the libertarian model and the Western Sharia model.
I will let the reader come to his/her conclusion on which model is preferable. And, as always, I am always open to have a constructive discussion in the comment section (which means that if the discussion is not done in a respectful manner, we will both go our own way LOL).
The name I have chosen for this article, The Gun in the Room, refers to the coercive power the government exerts on the domestic relationships between men and women. Since women constitute 61+% of the voters in Western countries and since men are biologically programmed to have an out-group preference as a reproductive strategy, the political and legal systems are skewed in towards women.
Since the cultural revolution of the 60s, women have achieved liberation from all social norms and expectations as a woman and as a wife. Any expectation of responsibilities on the part of women is met with a huge societal outrage. However, men have retained all of the expectation and responsibilities traditional society imposed on them. Men are still expected to provide and to protect women. They are expected to comfort or help any women in need, even if it a complete stranger. Men are expected to sacrifice for women without any hesitation or concerns for self preservation, even if the woman is a stranger or a complete bitch. Above all, men are expected to submit to women and to put their balls on the chopping block hoping that their spouse will not destroy their lives. Men who refuse to be part of the system are openly shamed and insulted by society. Even if they haven’t signed up to support women, the government will forcefully take their resources in order to finance the bad choices of women.
The bias of the system is the most apparent in family courts. Like Terrence Popp says: When you step into a family court and you have a penis, you are automatically a loser. They will bend you over and you will have to take it up the ass and your lawyer will only reduce the hits they will take on you.
Men know that they will lose half their shit; they will lose custody of their children 85% of the time; they will have to support financially for kids they will not be able to see; they will have to support their ex-wife long after the divorce; and women can choose to make false accusations of assault, rape or child abuse against the husband and the court will acknowledge these allocations as facts without any burden of proof. The next thing you know is that you lost your home; you live in a box in the street; you can’t find a job because of the criminal record due to the false accusations; and you end up in prison because you cannot make the payments. All of this because of 4 words from your wife: ‘’I’m not Happy!’’
This problem is so prevalent in our society that about 50% of the marriages end in divorce and that women initiate the divorce proceedings 70 to 80% of the time.
The amounts of false accusations against men have increased dramatically after the ‘’yes means yes’’ and the ‘’MeToo’’ movements. Men realize their disposability; they feel used and betrayed; and they realize that if their freedom can be taken away because of the wimbs of any women and that they are considered guilty until proven innocent (yet even if they prove their innocence, society will still treat them as criminals), they have no rights to speak off.
We also need to add infidelity, paternity fraud and the Duluth model, to the stacks of injustices done to men.
We need to point out that these attacks against men are made by women, but they are enforced by men. Cuck mangina feminist men, white knights and traditionalists are the ones who are enabling this system. Without these men, the feminists could spew all the insults and accusations they want, they wouldn’t have the strength to impose any consequences to men. The feminists are all bark and no bite. Think about this the next time you talk to a police officer. He may seem nice. But consider how many times he has used the Duluth Model and arrested innocent men for the simple reason that they are men and that a woman is making accusations. Suddenly, this cop doesn’t seem like a nice guy anymore. He is now a cog that enables a huge oppression machine to function.
This system is the primary cause of suicide in the West. But, women are still willing to throw men under the bus to maintain their privileges. Women who have conscience issues invent falls reasons for the gargantuan rate of male suicide, such as ‘’men need to talk about their emotions and we must remove maleness in young boy’s culture’’. Inventing false causes of a problem and directing the people’s attention to fake issues is worst than ignoring the problem all together. I will applaud the Muslims. They have found an ineffective and affordable solution to deal with such harpies. It involves stones; lots and lots of stones. It is good cardio as well. =D
This situation is unacceptable and men are leaving the system in droves. Women are already feeling the blow back of the injustices they have done to men. Men are opting out of marriage; they avoid hiring women; and are abandoning women in distress. Yes, girls, you heard me right. Look at the European women who are attacked by migrants in Europe (the migrants women wanted to import. I thought this fact was important to mention) and the men who are turning a blind eye and walking away. These men saw their fathers being destroyed in family courts; they were demonized for being male by the education system and by the media; they have been shamed and manipulated all their lives by women; women stood by and done nothing to protect men, when all they had to do was to speak out against the injustices done to men, instead they supported the system that oppresses men; and now you expect these men to risk their lives and legal repercussions to protect the same women, who have attacked men all their lives, from the problems women have created for themselves. ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FREAKING MINDS!!!!????? Ladies, you might as well get used to it because more and more men are abandoning you every day.
Now that we have exposed the problem, let’s see why the current system was meant to fail from the very start and how we can fix it.
Let me explain Briffault’s Law. This law states that the female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place. This means that the association between a male and a female depends on the promise of a benefit to the female; the length of time until the female receives the benefit; and the trust the female has that the male will deliver this benefit. If at any time, the male becomes unable to deliver the benefit; that the female question the ability to deliver the benefit; or if another male has the ability to deliver a greater benefit, than the female will consciously or unconsciously decide to abandon the male (Often, a woman will begin to search for flaws in her mate. She is trying to justify her desire to leave the relationship). Also, once the female receives the benefit, she has no reasons to maintain the association anymore.
Women have an in group preference. They will care for their children; they will care for their siblings; and they will care for other women. But women have not evolved to care about their mate. Women have evolved to have no issues sending the male do dangerous jobs to provide them resources; they have evolved to feel completely entitled and demand that the males sacrifice in order to protect them; and they have evolved to become sexually available to any males who conquer the tribe and who murders the males of the tribe.
We might believe that we have become a civilized species. However, we have only been civilized for tens of thousands of years. This is a short period of time compared to the millions of years where we have evolved to be predisposed to some extremely primal behaviors.
The male experiences relationships differently than females. The actually love their mate and their children. They will provide for, they will defend and they will sacrifice for their mate and for their children who are the members of the species that have the highest genetic proximity to them. Yet, male’s fertility window is greater than the fertility window of females. Once the children have reach adulthood, the males are predisposed to seek a younger female in order to start a second family.
Marriage is a contract between a man and a woman that serves 3 important functions:
- Ensure that females are provided for while they are disabled with children
- Ensure that the male is the biological father of the children
- Provide the best environment for the development of children
The current system is meant to fail, because it doesn’t take into account evolutionary psychology. It even goes against evolutionary psychology. It was inevitable that, with the fall of the authority that forced men and women to remain together (such as the church), we can only expect of relationships between the 2 genders to deteriorate after time. This is exactly what we observe in the West at the moment. The divorce rate is superior to 50% at the moment and it is increasing. Thus I will not consider the traditional Christian family model as a possible solution. This model has failed in every Western countries and every effort to revive this model will only lead to the same result in a generation of 2.
So I will focus on 3 models that have the potential of being successful: The MGTOW model, the Libertarian model and the Islamic model.
In this presentation, I will focus on successful unions between people in order to provide a stable environment to raise children and where the men will not get screwed by the courts. Because, the only logical reason a man would have to join a union is to raise children.
The MGTOW solution
The MGTOW are men who are walking away from the gynocentric system and who are waking away from women. So MGTOW have no issues having sex with women or having women friends, but they know that the system is skewed against men and they will not risk their resources or their freedom by getting involved in a relationship with women.
MGTOW focus on improving themselves, they focus on their career and they focus on activities they enjoy. Without a woman in their lives that siphons all their resources, the men who have adopted the MGTOW way of life can work less in order to maintain the same quality of life and their quality of life increases even more since they do not have to deal with all the bullshit women spew all the time (I suspect that this will increase the average life expectancy of genX and genZ men).
For a long time, MGTOW have been seeking a method to produce children that are genetically related to them without getting involved with a woman. They know that if they enter a marriage, the children will belong to the woman; they will probably be denied access to the children; and they know that the woman will use the children to make them pay through the nose for 18+ years. Such a method already exists. Surrogate mothers are a growing business in the West. A man can pay such a mother a few thousand dollars and obtain a children related to them 9 month later. If they are worried about the quality of the eggs of the surrogate mother, they can purchase eggs, have them fertilized in vitro and then inseminate the surrogate mother with them afterwards. This technique also allows you to make biopsies of the zygotes and select the zygote with the best genome.
The problem with being a single parent to raise a child is that you have no one to help you. This can impair your ability to work and to enjoy activities. However, if there are many MGTOW raising children, they can all live under the same roof and help each other out. If they don’t have the same work schedule, they can organised so that one parent is always available to take care of the children. You can have 3 or 4 men living under the same roof, raising 4, 6, 8 + children. With their combined resources, they can afford to live in a big house, in a good neighborhood. They can save to send their kids in good schools. They can even have a doll room if they want.
This solution is completely viable right now. You don’t even need to change the system, change the courts or to overthrow a government in order for this solution to work. This would allow women to keep wasting their lives riding the cock carousel and be completely irresponsible until it is too late. Their bad choices would have no more impacts on the lives of men. Also, since women will lose all their power over men, the only value the women will have is the price of their womb and eggs.
The Libertarian solution
This solution is based on freedom and the voluntary association of people in a contractual way. This solution would require the abolishment of the government or at lease to downsize the coercive power of the government. Since the current political model in the West is unsustainable, it is not only likely that the governments of the West will go bankrupt and fall, it is inevitable (what is unsustainable cannot continue. We only have to choose if we want a soft or hard landing). The removal of the government is essential for this solution because the government often voids contracts established before marriage, because the dissolution of this contract is done in a court of law instead of in a notary’s office (like contracts are usually mediate) and because those courts always arbitrate in favor of women.
Without cancer… OOoopps I meant the government, most of the problems we face today would be fixed. I will explain.
The first problem is, obviously, that we are trying to find an arrangement that everyone is obliged to conform too. A one size fits all with all the coercion in the world cannot work. We are all different, we have different values and we have different lifestyles. What is interesting about a contract is that you can put whatever you want in it.
- You could make a contract that does not force 2 people to be stuck together for the rest of their lives. For example, you could enter a contract with a woman at 20 years old to spend 20 years with that woman in order to raise 3 children. When the contract comes to term, you could decide to renew it or to make a new contract with a younger woman and raise a second family. The first wife would receive the benefice she was promised, which is half your wealth and she can do whatever she pleases without having to deal with a man.
- The contract could promote monogamy or enable relationships outside the contract. For example: The woman provides children to the man and he, in return, pays for her education, so that she can focus on her career while the contract ends. The man can argument that since the money is split 50/50, they could make a budget, determine how much her education will cost and allow the man to have the same amount at his disposal to spend on hoes.
- If you are wealthy, you could make a contract with more than one woman at a time.
- You can specify how the children will be raised in the contract.
Basically, you can put whatever you want in a contract. The beauty of this solution is that couples can find an arrangement that reflects their values and their way of life.
Of course, some couples will want to nullify the contract before it comes to term. This opens a market for companies who specialize in mediating these contracts. Such a company could serve as a witness during the signing of such contracts; they could provide some pre-made contracts or help the couple in the redaction of a customized contract; it could help the couple think about issues and situation they haven’t considered; it could offer counselling before and during the union; and it could help with the peaceful resolution of problems and/or separation.
The Islamic solution
If we do nothing and do not change the course the West is on at the moment, we can anticipate many Western countries to become Islamic states in a few decades. Unless there is an act of God, Sweden and Germany will certainly become such Islamic state around 2040 or 2050. If this is a desirable change or not is not for me to decide. The people of these countries do everything they can to increase the amount of migrants from 3rd world countries and they attack people who oppose mass migration. The people of Germany and Sweden have the right to decide the way they want to live. Maybe they want to have Sharia law. In this presentation, I only want to examine this solution objectively. The culture war is the topic of another discussion.
Let’s point out that this solution is the opposite of the Libertarian solution. Instead of providing the maximum freedom, it provide the most totalitarian and authoritarian system possible. It demands conformity from every members of society to predetermine specific roles. Also, in this system, there is no difference between religion and the state. They form a single entity.
In this solution, men are respected by society. They are respected as providers, as fathers and as protectors of the family. Since men and women are segregated, men have many opportunities to bond with other men. They can be invested in their work and in their activities without the fear of losing their marriage.
Women are respected as wives and as mothers. They do not need to fear the attention of unwanted males and every male that are related to her will protect her. The home is considered her domain and she can have expectations from her husband according to traditions.
One of the advantage of Sharia is that women are punished when they do something wrong. This is the opposite of the Western judicial system that liberates women from any responsibility from their actions. Sharia guarantees a man that the children he raises are his. If a woman commits paternity fraud she will be stoned to death (Which is a fair punishment for this type of crime).
I believe that many men in the West would rather pretend to pray a god 5 times per day if it meant that they are raising their biological children; that they will not have their lives destroyed in courts; and to know that they will be respected has men. These are things that men are unlikely to have in the current Western system. (To think that a medieval 3rd world system could be more desirable than a 21th century 1st world system shows how much the West has turned to shit)
The problem with this system is that there is no freedom for anyone. There is no way to leave the system; no way to express yourself; no innovation. Everything that contradicts the Qur’an is unacceptable in this system. This means that science will stop progressing. The West would turn into the 3rd world.
Also, this solution would only restore the family until Islam is reformed, which is inevitable. And then we are back at square one.
I would like to point out that feminists should take a moment and consider the consequences of their actions. In their frenzy to destroy Western civilization, they are advocating for Sharia to become the law of the land. What they don’t realize is that under that system, they will very likely be stoned to death. Islam is not very tolerance of hysterical crazy harpies. If these bitches had 2 brain cells to rub together they would realize that a Libertarian system in the West is preferable for everyone, even them. Sure, we are going to debate them; we will debunk their bullshit; and we will try to free people from their indoctrination. But at lease, we are not going to kill them.
Conclusion
I hope you have enjoyed this presentation. I believe that resolving the male/female relationships are essential in solving the problems in the West. This is why we must look at the problem objectively and to find viable solutions. As always, I’m open for civil conversations.
Gato Villano