Anonymity is a Powerful Tool
2018/09/14
Anonymity is a Powerful Tool
This is a rebuttal to some arguments made by Canadian Libertarian in the video ‘’Social Media insiders are starting to push back’’. Of course I’m not trying to attack Hunter, he’s a good man and he wasn’t wrong in his video. I’m just going to offer another point of view between friends.
In his presentation, Hunter talks about the importance of standing up for what you believe, this is a very good advice. He talks about the cowardness of remaining anonymous. That you should go public and say out loud what you believe in. To make sure that everyone sees your face and knows your name.
I agree and disagree with that statement. It depends on what you are trying to do and what is your position.
Tell me which sentence you are more likely to hear from the left:
• ‘’The construction worker who fixed that guy’s roof is a libertarian. He believes in liberty and the free market. DESTROY HIM!!!!! AAAAaaaarrrrhhhhh (in a geeky soy boy, unmanly kind of way)’’
• ‘’That scientist working at NASA who published 72 scientific papers and who landed a probe on an asteroid racing through space at 84 000 mph, is wearing a shirt with 1950s pin-up women depicted on it. DESTROY HIM!!!! MISOGINY!!! REEEEEeeeeeeeee…’’
I can make the case that the left cannot afford having anyone in STEM, in education, in Tech, in the media. the entertainment industry or in politic with an opinion different than them. These are all the power centers that the left have fought to control for the last 60+ years. If the hold all of these institutions, then they control the narrative and they do not need to win the argument anymore. Just look at the American election of 2016. For how long have Americans fought to elect a leader that would shrink the size of the government? Look how hard Trump had to fight to get into office and the endless riots done by the left that we are still dealing with today.
But Trump is a force of nature. Not everyone would be able to do what he did.
Let me talk to you about James Watson. Watson is, without a doubt, the greatest scientist that is still breathing today. You might have heard of the discovery of the DNA double helix by Watson and Crick. Watson is the kind of scientist for which you would need to have rhino size marbles to argue with on the topic of genetic. This guy took control of the Eugenic project and he has petitioned the UN to allow him to make super human clones. They didn’t allow him to make clones, but no one could touch him. The guy created revolutionised transgenic technology and created plants that are more efficient and are resistant to pests and diseases. Again, no one could touch him.
Eventually, Watson made a race realist comment about the reality of the average intelligence of Africans. He explained that Africans will never be able to free themselves from misery unless we increase their IQ. Watson made that comment because he wanted to create clones with a superior IQ; introduce the clones inside the African population so they would breed with the natives; then, within a few generations the average IQ in Africa would increase (this is the Eugenic approach of Watson, which is the opposite of the traditional Eugenic approach, which is to sterilise or eliminate the individuals with a lower IQ).
James Watson wanted to help Africa. He stuck his neck out for his ideas. Some people might not like his ideas, but he wanted to do good. While he had his neck out, the feminists did what no one in the scientific community could ever do. They destroyed his career and attacked everything he has ever accomplished. A bunch of blue hair land whales who cannot count to 5 without using their fingers destroyed the career of one of the most brilliant man in history. They even had his Nobel Prize taken away.
James Watson should have been a boxer. He took all these blows right in the jaw and he is still out there kicking. Unfortunately, he is an old man and he might not live to see his dream of improving the human genome. The real loser in this story is humanity. We are so bigoted and fearful that we are passing on the opportunity to improve the human race in a way that would take hundreds of thousands of years, if not millions of years, of evolution to accomplish. (I went on a bit of a tangent again I think 😉)
Most politicians have learned the lesson. Look at Doug Ford, Maxime Bernier and François Legault. The understand that if they are too radical during their elections, the left is going to go bat shit crazy on their ass and the average folks are going to be scared by change. Like we talked in an earlier discussion, politic is like inertial. An object will keep moving in a certain direction (even if it is a disastrous crash course) as long as it doesn’t encounter another force and even if it encounters a force, it will resist any change that would alter this course. So what do politicians do during elections? They act vanilla as fuck.
During the elections they will say something edgy like ‘’I will refuse any carbon tax in Ontario’’, but they won’t talk about changing the sex ed curriculum in school. They will say that they will reduce the influx of migrants by 10 000 per year, but they won’t say that they will close the borders. I think it is a pretty good tactic.
Let’s talk about academia and STEM for a bit.
If you want to have a diploma, you need to get accepted by a university and you need succeed in your classes. Unfortunately, almost everyone in academia and in STEM is the most radical leftists you have ever seen. At my university, we have the privilege of listening to leftist propaganda by the teachers on a regular basis. You know very well that if you are a white male, you cannot make excuses. There are no quotas for white men; teachers are not pushing to have more white men in those fields. But, you are regularly reminded that teachers are desperately trying to push women and minorities to the top. They will praise them at the beginning of the class; they will encourage them to do better; they will look over cheating and plagiarism; they will give good grades to papers that are absolute garbage. I know, I went to see a teacher and explained to him that every Muslim in his class cheated during his exams. He told me ‘’it is not because they are talking to each other during an exam that we must automatically assume that they are cheating’’. I’ve seen teachers walk out of the class for 15 minutes during an exam to allow these migrants to cheat.
I’m saying all this to make a point. If the teachers want you to pass, they will make sure you pass. If they want to destroy your academic career, they can do it with no effort. If they don’t like you, they can reject your research or refuse you on a project (besides, they will probably pick a black Muslim woman who is disable over you in order to virtue signal). Sticking your neck out while you are at the university is not a good idea at all.
Anonymity can be a useful tool as well and this is a point I talked about in the presentation you read on your channel. The problem in academia, STEM, big tech companies, the media, politic and education, is that everyone on the top is a leftist and they are blocking the way for everyone else who have the ‘’wrong opinions’’ to climb the echelons. The most efficient way to change this is to not rattle the cage and make your way up. When you are at the top, you have a vote on policies; you can support research that goes against the leftist agenda; you have a voice in a committee, that usually consist of no more than 5 or 10 people, to allow free speech on campus. Anonymity is a strategic move when it can give you access to positions that will actually weaken the left. Like I said in the other presentation, infiltration is the weak point of the left.
And even if you don’t make it as a chairman (yeah I said it, chairMAN!!! To every leftist that was triggered by that, Suck my fucking balls 😉), you can still become a university teacher. Then you have the opportunity to challenge people’s beliefs. Imagine if every semester, you have a debate in class about climate change in class. During that debate you reject all fifis. You only accept scientific arguments. Imagine the changes you can make after one or 2 generations.
I could go on, but you said that your viewers love short videos. I hope you will consider my arguments.
Gato Villano