About Entitlement
2018/10/05
About Entitlement
This is a follow up to the presentation I did yesterday, ‘’about traditionalism’’. I believe that more needs to be said about this topic.
When you hear the word, entitlement, what comes to mind? For many of you (especially women), you might think of the suffragette movement of the 20th century. Ideas like: why do you feel you are entitled to my body; why do you feel entitled to my freedom; what makes you think you can dictate how I live my life; just because someone as a womb, does that mean that this person must be forced into childbirth. Why couldn’t I find a job, have my place of my own and live my life the way I see fit. Of course, this way of thinking degenerated into the mass murder of babies through the pro-choice movement. This terrible movement has a kill count that would put Chairman Mao to shame, but this is a topic of another day.
People often take for granted the freedom you express through a choice. Often you only notice this freedom when it is denied or when this freedom is taken away.
Alison Tieman explained to us that we have a society problem. Which is the inability of society (both men and women) to express empathy for men. Considerations we might give to one gender are not granted to another gender. This phenomenon is more visible in drastic circumstances:
In 1912, the unsinkable ship, Titanic, decided change its identity to a submarine and punished all the privileged white people who misgendered it, by giving them a dip in icy water (HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA sorry, but this kind post modern word salad that comes out of academia makes me laugh. I’m going to be serious now, I swear 😉).
For the first time in history, the social contract between men and women was stated clearly. No time for political correctness. ''Women and children first'', which means that men are disposable. Women felt entitled to board the lifeboats and men were expected to stand aside, comfort the women (‘’there there honey, it is ok to leave me here to die. You go on and have a nice fulfilling life’’), and most of all, men were expected to die.
I believe that it is in respect for those men that history books depict this scene as women calmly boarding the lifeboats while the men stoically stood by. We know that shots were fired to control the crowds. I suspect that some men fought for their lives while other men (white knights) held them down, forcing them to accept their fate. I suspect that some of them also had mental breakdowns while waiting for the ship to go down. The red pill they swallowed that night was probably very bitter as they realized the meaning of male disposability.
One man boarded a lifeboat. His name was Joseph Bruce Ismay. He was the man who had the boat build and the man who thought lifeboats would look ugly on his boat. He survived the event and was shamed by society. This shame was twofold. He was blamed for neglecting the safety of the passenger and because he did not follow the program. The program was for him to die. He was shamed because he continued breathing oxygen. Think about that for a moment. Society denied him his natural right to live. Self preservation as a male was something shameful and looked down upon. Yet, no one shamed any of the women for continuing their existence. They just abandoned their man to die; cried a little; got a little sleep; then went back on the meat market to find a man who would marry them and take care of them. (Guys, this so called female empathy is nothing but a myth)
The Titanic is just an extreme example of a disease that infects our everyday life. It seems so common to us that we hardly notice it.
Too often you see men racing to the defense of the damsel in distress. We are biologically and culturally programmed to do so. Men of every period of history have risked life and limb to rescue women. The same women that run away and leave men behind to deal with the danger men rescued them from. This behavior is so pathological that women actually use and abuse this evolutionary behavior. When a woman is upset at a man and she wishes to cause him physical harm, often she will use other men to do the dirty deed for her. This makes a lot of sense because she probably doesn’t have the physical strength to do a lot of damage to a man. But if she’s has the sex appeal, she can act out the damsel in distress and use white knights to beat the living shit out of this man. She can also use the police and courts to harm this man.
Let me tell you a story that happened to me. Me and my brother (who is a corn fed big imposing kinda guy) were in the subway. We walked by 2 girls and 2 douche bags that seemed to have a dispute. One of the girls decided to call out for help to me and my brother. To my surprise, my brother started walking menacingly towards the guys. So I yelled out at him ‘’Hey! What the fuck are you doing?’’. He was like ‘’Euhh, well I was going to help these girls’’. I told him ‘’You don’t know these girls; you don’t know these guys; you don’t know the story; for all we know, these girls might be the ones in the wrong. This doesn’t concern you, come on let’s go’’. And as we were leaving, I noticed that the 4 idiots weren’t fighting anymore. They were staring at us, not knowing what to say. 😉
I’ll be honest with you. I have been young and stupid. I have intervened more often then I’d like to admit to save damsels in distress. What I learned from these experiences is that the girl will run back to her douche bag in less than a week and you will be in a situation where a dude with a violent behavior in your neighborhood doesn’t like you very much. It is not a pleasant situation.
These types of situations can take many aspects. A man is expected to risk his life to save women and children from traffic or from a burning buildings. You see men suffering third degree burns and being disfigured for the rest of their lives for having played the hero. I have seen men who have suffered acid burns because they decided to do the dirty jobs to spare women the dangerous tasks. You can see on YouTube videos of men who jump on a train track to save complete strangers. Yes, it is a very noble behavior. If you do this kind of shit, you will have the respect of people… for a while. But they will eventually forget your deed. All that will be left is a disfigured man or an invalid. Someone who is frowned upon by women. If this man becomes ugly or handicapped, there is a very good probability that his wife or girlfriend will leave him. This woman will be thankful she could use this man to save her and then she will replace him with an undamaged man.
You are disposable.
I’m not saying that you shouldn’t help your fellow man. But when it is expected or demanded of you that you risk your life and health against your better judgement; when you are shamed by society for not throwing away your life; when you are criminally charged for not running to the defense of dumbass women who got into the stupid situations where they are in danger; there is a problem.
A man is also used as a provider. Women of every period felt no shame to send their husband to do backbreaking work. Work that involved very real danger in order to be provided for. Work that will eventually cause health problems and significantly reduce the life expectancy of men.
You might have seen elderly men bent in 2 do to their broken back, crossing the street slower than a snail. You might have seen their difficulty to breath. You might have seen their facial expression; an expression of someone in constant pain. The expression of someone who is tired and broken. And you might also have noticed the girls behind these elderly men, mocking them, laughing at them. These men's bodies were broken through a lifetime of labor. This labor was in the service of women and they aren't even wordy of the respect of women. I have seen this a thousand times. Men of the silent generation who woke up at the break of dawn to go work at the docks shoveling asbestos without a mask for 40 years of their life and spend their remaining years of their lives with an oxygen mask struggling for breath. Men who worked in the foundries. Spending 10+ hours a day literally cooking alive. Men who went down into the mines, working with their back bent all day long every day. Not seeing daylight for years.
I’m getting somewhere with this rant. Women from the beginning of the 20th century to this very day argue that men should not feel entitled to their bodies and their time. They argue that they have only one life and that they have the right to decide how to live it. These women are completely correct. However, unlike women, I will apply the same principal for men.
Men, your body is your own. You only get one body and when it is damaged you cannot replace it. Your health belongs to you. As a man, you have a lot of physical strength. This strength belongs to you. You can use it how you see fit. Time is a limited commodity. Your time is your own and you have the right to spend it how you see fit. If you spend unites of time earning resources, these resources belong to you.
No one is entitled to your body, to your health, to your strength, to your time and to your resources. Yet, we live in a society that advocates that you should give up all of those things in the service of women. Women believe that they are entitled to all of those things and traditionalists support this belief. There is no difference between a man who feels entitled to a woman’s womb because he is a man and a woman who believes she is entitled to a man’s resources because she is a woman. Both of them believe they are entitled to another person’s body. This is wrong. This is terribly wrong. To put it in simpler terms: we are talking of an individual who wants to have dominion over another individual.
This pathology goes way beyond women. The state can claim that it is entitled to take away your time, to take away your health, to take away your freedom and to use your strength to obtain its goals. The state will not even ask, it will demand it of you. Thus, the state can grab men; remove them from their everyday lives; send them overseas; give them a riffle and demand that they run through a killing field in order to go murder other men who are there against their will.
Let me tell you something you are going to find disgusting. During WW1, young boys joined the army and were sent to Europe because they were shamed by feminists who gave them white feathers, telling them that women are not interested in cowards. In Europe, they had a taste of modern warfare. Scientists, like me, found creative and efficient new ways for men to kill each other in unspeakable ways. These boys were stuck in trenches dealing with psychological warfare 24/7. They were in constant fear that mortars would fall on their heads, that machine guns would tear them into pieces and most of all, they were afraid of chemical warfare. (this makes you think, who should you be more afraid of: the 250lbs war harden US marine or the 140lbs chemist who never held a riffle in his life. The veterans of WW1 knew the answer to that question.)
Here is the point I’m trying to make. WW1 saw the beginnings of mental illnesses due to psychological warfare. Soldiers that were shell shocked. Others had PTSD. Some of these boys laughed for no reason when you tried to reason with them. They started walking in any direction for no reason. The army treated many of those boys as deserters and executed them.
So, the state took away the freedom of these boys; forced them in a war against their will; made these boys suffer hell on earth; and then killed them because they became useless.
You are disposable.
Let’s talk about recent events. Europe is flooded with third world migrants. These migrants are coming to Europe because women, who decided not to have children, feel that they need to nurture what they believe are disadvantaged people. Their motherly instincts are hijacked by globalists and used to replace the demographic of Europe.
Men, on the other hand are being used by women and the state. Women demand that men protect them from the violent and rapy migrants. At the same time, women are shaming men for their ‘’toxic masculinity’’. The state fund the replacement of the European people with the taxes paid by men and at the same time, the state is discriminating against white men through quotas in the workplace.
All these leeches are using you. They are using your production, your strength and your health. These leeches feel entitled to all of these things, they will take it by force if they have too and they will feel no shame in using men.
Let’s look at it through the lens of evolutionary biology. Women act very differently when they feel safe compared to when they feel they are in danger. Look at the last Quebec election. The same women who shamed men for their ‘’intolerance’’ of migrants that are incompatible with the West, voted for a government that advocates for a significant reduction of migration to Quebec. What happened? Well, Trump got elected which led to hundreds of thousands of Muslims and Haitians to leave the USA and to enter the province of Quebec illegally. Men and the government did nothing to prevent this nor to stop this. Canada basically had no borders. Women suddenly found themselves in a city where 50 000 of Haitians lived amongst them. Gangs of filthy (I don’t mean filthy in a rude racist way. What I mean is that they are very dirty and smelly. They clearly have different views concerning personal hygiene from Canadians. 😉) black men followed them around, staring at them in uncomfortable ways. At the same time, Canadian men learned the lesson very well from all the nagging of women. They learned that they shouldn’t do anything that could be interpreted as racist. So yeah… women were no longer defended and they had to deal with the migrants they asked for.
So, if men want the invasion of Europe to end, all they have to do is to stop protecting women. When women demand you defend them from their stupid decisions, don’t throw away your health. Just walk on by. If men do this on a large enough scale, women will change their voting strategy.
You can apply this way of thinking to many aspect of your life. You can start working reasonable hours; choose jobs that are less stressful and less dangerous. You can spend more time with your children and have a better health and better quality of life. You can stop risking your life to save women that have no genetic proximity to you.
In the long run, men will live longer and healthier. And yes, this might significantly reduce the life expectancy of women who make bad choices. I suspect that within a generation, women would no longer be the majority of voters if we applied this strategy. This would mean that socialist governments who appeal to women would be voted out of office.
And finally, I would ask all you men out there. Are you tired of being a disposable commodity? Think about that and let me know in the comments.
Gato Villano