The parallels between the manson family and antifa
Throughout history there have been repetitions. Not necessarily cycles, like the weather patterns but more individuals and groups that do so to emulate greatness. Tried and tested so why not? Or conversely, those who repeat history via not learning its lessons.
The former are evidenced nicely in figures such as Richard the lionheart through to Churchill; similarities in the way they led an army in times where the odds were heavily stacked against them.
The latter, Louis the 14th to Hitler, who inadvertently aped the frenchmans desire for power and not just absolute monarchy but absolute conformity. Something well read Winston telegraphed long before most even held Adolf under suspicion.
The repetition can be simulated or even nullified by modern technology, mobile phones enabling us to avoid picking the wrong carrier pigeon or even having to deliberate which one may be most disciplined. We've come a long way. As well as have access to more information than ever, enabling us to learn from it. The tailside of that technology coin looks like what the millennium bug was forecast to be or what actually happens with a standard quiet family night in, prolonged and frustrated by how long it takes to decide which of the many options available on Netflix or other providers. Or how about the modern day performers who are a little, like most, shy when honing their craft and the surveillance society we now live in stifling their ambition. How many creative geniuses has big brother (cctv, not the social experiment turned fame at all costs tv show) taken from us? Other side effects include doxing, depression, obesity.
Technology and modern times on the whole have also created a certain laziness in some, not just doomed to repeat history but do it worse.
The groups on the wrong side of history have at times been at an extra disadavantage. Peer pressure and all. But one particular group that handled that very badly were the manson family and ironically another more modern well equipped group handled it even worse...antifa. There are striking comparisons like the delusions of their horrific actions being for a greater good (that only they appear to know). Like the lack of evidence they are able to give to justify what they do, strikingly similar in the difference between their suggested intentions and how they behave. From this is our land we defend it to murdering fellow inhabitants; from standing up to fascists (that don't exist) to behaving like actual fascists. Both preached mother earth while having a distain for fellow inhabitants who dared question their unbelievably flawed way of life. Antagonised by discussions or contrary information. But where they differ is where one group took over backwoods and though parasites all the same, minimised their impact by merely mooching off of cabin owners, allowing drug induced delusions to impose their ways on people. The other group seeks attention not via their figurehead (Soros isn't quite as public or flamboyant as Manson) but by getting out in public in numbers and feeling the pay off from their disrespect and destruction of people and property. Arguable a less intellectual or discreet way of dominance. Despite not tripping balls to the same degree and having access to knowledge that exposes their b.s far more readily. Going out in masks too, add more cowardly than the mansons to that list. Technology need to be kept in check as does an onus on critical thinking. But if both these groups aren't the perfect advert for bringing back national service, I don't know what is.
Deluded, uneducated and one dimensional alike yes; but if left unchecked (mansons) or worse even supported by the msm (antifa) can become very dangerous. As we have seen.